http://www.haloscan.com/ Latest comments for sharon01. Syndicated by HaloScan http://www.haloscan.com/ http://www.haloscan.com/halolink.gif http://www.haloscan.com/ 88 31 Commenting Powered by HaloScan.com http://www.haloscan.com/comments/sharon01/6154643086482794942/?src=hsr#84881 Fri, 20 Nov 2009 06:08:00 +0000 http://www.haloscan.com/comments/sharon01/6154643086482794942/?src=hsrs#84881 http://www.haloscan.com/comments/sharon01/6154643086482794942/?src=hsrs#84881 I don't care if Holder is AG, Ultimately BO has to be responsible for him. And this proposed trial is BO's problem no matter how far he wants to distance himself. As long as the Military has custody, BO has custody as CiC. BO just can't say Holder took them. http://www.haloscan.com/comments/sharon01/6842714618131347880/?src=hsr#84873 Thu, 19 Nov 2009 13:25:38 +0000 http://www.haloscan.com/comments/sharon01/6842714618131347880/?src=hsrs#84873 http://www.haloscan.com/comments/sharon01/6842714618131347880/?src=hsrs#84873 3. Jimmy Carter was utterly blindsided by the taking of American hostages in Iran, when it was quite apparent that the Iranian mullahs "Death to America" campaign would lead to just such a situation. Then he sat around for 444 days allowing the Iranians to humiliate our country (you probably consider it to have been "engagement"). As for the economic policies you think were so great, I'm really gl http://www.haloscan.com/comments/sharon01/6842714618131347880/?src=hsr#84870 Thu, 19 Nov 2009 13:14:21 +0000 http://www.haloscan.com/comments/sharon01/6842714618131347880/?src=hsrs#84870 http://www.haloscan.com/comments/sharon01/6842714618131347880/?src=hsrs#84870 1. How can you say that there's "no coddling of thugs or dictators going on"? We have a president who has embraced Hugo Chavez (allowing him to be photographed with Chavez and a very anti-American book), bowed to the Saudi king, kowtowed to the Japanese leader (a move that embarrassed the Japanese, as well as Americans), who dissed our greatest ally (Great Britain), sold out Eastern Europeans (and http://www.haloscan.com/comments/sharon01/6842714618131347880/?src=hsr#84863 Thu, 19 Nov 2009 07:41:52 +0000 http://www.haloscan.com/comments/sharon01/6842714618131347880/?src=hsrs#84863 http://www.haloscan.com/comments/sharon01/6842714618131347880/?src=hsrs#84863 Sharon, your site here seems to have a limit on the number of words, or is it lines? So here I repeat the last paragraph: And yes, I do believe we attacked Iraq for control of oil, as well as to establish a strategic military position in the middle of the Middle East to help Israel. Neither goal was successful, which is why you neocons would rather forget, or revise. Certainly deposing Sadda... http://www.haloscan.com/comments/sharon01/6842714618131347880/?src=hsr#84862 Thu, 19 Nov 2009 07:38:46 +0000 http://www.haloscan.com/comments/sharon01/6842714618131347880/?src=hsrs#84862 http://www.haloscan.com/comments/sharon01/6842714618131347880/?src=hsrs#84862 1. There is no coddling of dictators or thugs going on, but they cannot be ignored, and must be dealt with in such a way that they are not multiplied, as happened under Bush. You have not internalized the fact that we are now in a position of weakness economically and militarily, therefore must take that into account strategically and tactically, militarily vis a vis Afghanistan, and economically... http://www.haloscan.com/comments/sharon01/6842714618131347880/?src=hsr#84860 Thu, 19 Nov 2009 06:40:04 +0000 http://www.haloscan.com/comments/sharon01/6842714618131347880/?src=hsrs#84860 http://www.haloscan.com/comments/sharon01/6842714618131347880/?src=hsrs#84860 John, let Sharon handle her end of the debate. If you wish to bring up or discuss a specific issue, fine, but cut out these unsubstantiated attacks, unless you have a specific incident to call to my attention. OK? Otherwise I will either ignore your nonsense or push back at it, as now. http://www.haloscan.com/comments/sharon01/3566853150439851190/?src=hsr#84858 Thu, 19 Nov 2009 05:59:25 +0000 http://www.haloscan.com/comments/sharon01/3566853150439851190/?src=hsrs#84858 http://www.haloscan.com/comments/sharon01/3566853150439851190/?src=hsrs#84858 Apheral, it seems to me that when the city granted monopoly bargaining status to the SEIU, at a minimum, the spirit of the anti-trust laws were violated. http://www.haloscan.com/comments/sharon01/6154643086482794942/?src=hsr#84855 Thu, 19 Nov 2009 05:09:45 +0000 http://www.haloscan.com/comments/sharon01/6154643086482794942/?src=hsrs#84855 http://www.haloscan.com/comments/sharon01/6154643086482794942/?src=hsrs#84855 I think the whole purpose is to allow the defense to put the Bush administration and the CIA on trial, airing all sorts of secrets that will be helpful to our enemies without Barack Obama having to be directly involved. If I were a campaign manager, I'd start running ads for 2012 stating that the Obama administration was more concerned about paybacks than American safety. This is disgraceful. http://www.haloscan.com/comments/sharon01/192879357543451821/?src=hsr#84854 Thu, 19 Nov 2009 05:07:56 +0000 http://www.haloscan.com/comments/sharon01/192879357543451821/?src=hsrs#84854 http://www.haloscan.com/comments/sharon01/192879357543451821/?src=hsrs#84854 LOL I'll tell you this story, Yorkshire. Back when I was a young woman and worked at the local newspaper, we used to go to a dive down the street after work to unwind (this would be about 1AM). The place was dark with lots of "local color." One night, a fight broke out at one of the pool tables at the front of the bar. The fight escalated, sort of like a snowball rolling downhill, and was headed t http://www.haloscan.com/comments/sharon01/6842714618131347880/?src=hsr#84853 Thu, 19 Nov 2009 05:06:21 +0000 http://www.haloscan.com/comments/sharon01/6842714618131347880/?src=hsrs#84853 http://www.haloscan.com/comments/sharon01/6842714618131347880/?src=hsrs#84853 Perry, are you once again trying to censor me? All these times you declare "you made that stuff up" and the facts get shoved in your face has to frustrate you. How many times have you demanded in very authoritarian fashion that people provide proof or "admit [they] made that stuff up?" And how many times have people provided that irrefutable evidence (that you subsequently refused to admit)?