<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Comments for superdoc - HaloScan.com</title>
    <link>http://www.haloscan.com/</link>
    <description>Latest comments for superdoc. Syndicated by HaloScan</description>
    <generator>http://www.haloscan.com/</generator>
    
    <item>
      <title>Thread: 7562724876191775396. Post by Josh</title>
      <link>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/superdoc/7562724876191775396/?src=hsr#388395</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 20:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
      <comments>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/superdoc/7562724876191775396/?src=hsrs#388395</comments>
      <guid>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/superdoc/7562724876191775396/?src=hsrs#388395</guid>
      <description>Wow.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thread: 5895867367860534453. Post by Gabe Moothart</title>
      <link>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/superdoc/5895867367860534453/?src=hsr#386928</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 21:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
      <comments>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/superdoc/5895867367860534453/?src=hsrs#386928</comments>
      <guid>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/superdoc/5895867367860534453/?src=hsrs#386928</guid>
      <description>Linds/Jim,
You're welcome. I'm glad it was helpful.

Linds, that Stanford class sounds interesting - although I'm not sure I trust them to do it right :-).

By the way, I just ran across a book which claims to show what I hinted at in my post, that the Genesis account actually does correspond closely to the story of creation told by modern sc</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thread: 5895867367860534453. Post by linds</title>
      <link>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/superdoc/5895867367860534453/?src=hsr#386913</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 20:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
      <comments>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/superdoc/5895867367860534453/?src=hsrs#386913</comments>
      <guid>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/superdoc/5895867367860534453/?src=hsrs#386913</guid>
      <description>Thanks for this - I'm an old-earther myself, and it's nice to see some great, concise arguments for it from theology.

In other news, Stanford's offering a class this term I wish I could take: the Evolution of Creationism.  It's a historical study of various creationist theories from ancient Greece to modern intelligent design.  It purports not to critique creationism, but to chronicle the theor...</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thread: 5895867367860534453. Post by James</title>
      <link>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/superdoc/5895867367860534453/?src=hsr#386864</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 13:29:18 +0000</pubDate>
      <comments>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/superdoc/5895867367860534453/?src=hsrs#386864</comments>
      <guid>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/superdoc/5895867367860534453/?src=hsrs#386864</guid>
      <description>Thanks for posting that, Gabe, it was worth the read.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thread: 6458876894272502230. Post by Jessica</title>
      <link>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/superdoc/6458876894272502230/?src=hsr#386691</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 20:38:14 +0000</pubDate>
      <comments>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/superdoc/6458876894272502230/?src=hsrs#386691</comments>
      <guid>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/superdoc/6458876894272502230/?src=hsrs#386691</guid>
      <description>I believe you that most of the families see it differently than we do, and I could see how it would make the contradictions I see seem less important.  If your fight is the one within TEC, you care about different things.  (Reminds me of this essay by Sarah Hey - forgive my lack of HTML tags - http://standfirminfaith.com/index.php/site/article/24332/ - have you read it?)

I know that part of the...</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thread: 6458876894272502230. Post by Gabe Moothart</title>
      <link>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/superdoc/6458876894272502230/?src=hsr#386648</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 14:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
      <comments>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/superdoc/6458876894272502230/?src=hsrs#386648</comments>
      <guid>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/superdoc/6458876894272502230/?src=hsrs#386648</guid>
      <description>Jess,
Just a few quick comments, as I think we're converging on &quot;we just see this differently&quot;:

I agree with you that God will work out the current turmoil, but that doesn’t mean that TEC will forever be “God’s church”

The problem isn't just with TEC. Global Anglicanism itself is in a bad way. Several provinces are only a little behind TEC, the ABC himself is hardly a paragon of orth</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thread: 6458876894272502230. Post by Jessica</title>
      <link>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/superdoc/6458876894272502230/?src=hsr#386595</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 20:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
      <comments>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/superdoc/6458876894272502230/?src=hsrs#386595</comments>
      <guid>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/superdoc/6458876894272502230/?src=hsrs#386595</guid>
      <description>OT, but, Gabe, I think your comment page is growing to book-size proportions.  &quot;Conversations on the Polity of a Parish&quot;?</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thread: 6458876894272502230. Post by Jessica</title>
      <link>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/superdoc/6458876894272502230/?src=hsr#386594</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 20:26:08 +0000</pubDate>
      <comments>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/superdoc/6458876894272502230/?src=hsrs#386594</comments>
      <guid>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/superdoc/6458876894272502230/?src=hsrs#386594</guid>
      <description>...Again, this isn&amp;#8217;t meant to hurt in anyway, though I know that the disagreement does hurt.  I think it&amp;#8217;s worth bearing with the hurt in order to speak our hearts to each other.  I hope you agree.  Staying or leaving, you guys are friends, and we&amp;#8217;re glad to know you and to know that we all are doing our best to follow where the Lord leads us.  That&amp;#8217;s what&amp;#8217;s really im</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thread: 6458876894272502230. Post by Jessica</title>
      <link>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/superdoc/6458876894272502230/?src=hsr#386593</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 20:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
      <comments>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/superdoc/6458876894272502230/?src=hsrs#386593</comments>
      <guid>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/superdoc/6458876894272502230/?src=hsrs#386593</guid>
      <description>...&amp;#8220;I can understand how someone who sees it as impossible to be simultaneously in both TEC and ACNA would not see a diversified parish as coherent.&amp;#8221; &amp;#8592; I think that this the heart of our disagreement.  If you think that you can be in both ACNA and TEC at once, then the &amp;#8220;diversified parish&amp;#8221; makes a lot of sense &amp;#8211; it&amp;#8217;s the best of both worlds!

&amp;#8220;(For</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thread: 6458876894272502230. Post by Jessica</title>
      <link>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/superdoc/6458876894272502230/?src=hsr#386592</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 20:24:59 +0000</pubDate>
      <comments>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/superdoc/6458876894272502230/?src=hsrs#386592</comments>
      <guid>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/superdoc/6458876894272502230/?src=hsrs#386592</guid>
      <description>Hi Katie!

Yes, weddings have a way of pushing everything else to the side, don&amp;#8217;t they?  Totally worth it though.  &amp;#9786;

I don&amp;#8217;t know quite how to put this, so please forgive me if I do it badly, but I just wanted to start off by addressing your view that some of my opinions are hurtful.  For what it&amp;#8217;s worth, I agree.  This whole situation hurts.  The official stance of Bl</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
