<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Comments for thomasn528 - HaloScan.com</title>
    <link>http://www.haloscan.com/</link>
    <description>Latest comments for thomasn528. Syndicated by HaloScan</description>
    <generator>http://www.haloscan.com/</generator>
    
    <item>
      <title>Thread: Worth reading. Post by Thomas Nephew</title>
      <link>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/thomasn528/5936198646508878904/?src=hsr#211501</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 20:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
      <comments>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/thomasn528/5936198646508878904/?src=hsrs#211501</comments>
      <guid>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/thomasn528/5936198646508878904/?src=hsrs#211501</guid>
      <description>Sorry to have left you hanging here.  I've moved my blog to a new site -- newsrackblog.com.  If you like, please feel free to copy your comments to the corresponding post at that site: Worth reading; all but your last two comments (ie, 6-15-08, 2:50pm and 2:52pm) are already there.  I'll follow this with an e-mail.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thread: A Court in deeper trouble than I had imagined. Post by Christine Hassenstab</title>
      <link>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/thomasn528/108005212880170025/?src=hsr#211346</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 04:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
      <comments>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/thomasn528/108005212880170025/?src=hsrs#211346</comments>
      <guid>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/thomasn528/108005212880170025/?src=hsrs#211346</guid>
      <description>As an old public defender, I can make this very simple: Scalia is a whackjob.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thread: Worth reading. Post by Rad Geek</title>
      <link>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/thomasn528/5936198646508878904/?src=hsr#211227</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 09:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
      <comments>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/thomasn528/5936198646508878904/?src=hsrs#211227</comments>
      <guid>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/thomasn528/5936198646508878904/?src=hsrs#211227</guid>
      <description>[Continued from above...]


To return to open immigration and &quot;undercutting legal labor markets,&quot; I think there's a basic problem in the way you're framing the issue. It's true that, under certain circumstances, when large numbers of  poor immigrants move to a particular community, the average wage for existing native-born workers will tend to go down as a result of competition. But the average</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thread: Worth reading. Post by Rad Geek</title>
      <link>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/thomasn528/5936198646508878904/?src=hsr#211226</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 09:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
      <comments>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/thomasn528/5936198646508878904/?src=hsrs#211226</comments>
      <guid>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/thomasn528/5936198646508878904/?src=hsrs#211226</guid>
      <description>You write:

The Constitution gives the federal government ultimate authority over immigration, for good reason, in my view.

Well, but this just relocates the question. If the Constitution delegates authority in such-and-such a way, what gives authority to the United States Constitution to decide the question? (I can write &quot;Open borders and amnesty for all&quot; on a napkin</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thread: Memory almost full. Post by Thomas Nephew</title>
      <link>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/thomasn528/4019367517967249902/?src=hsr#211185</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 10:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
      <comments>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/thomasn528/4019367517967249902/?src=hsrs#211185</comments>
      <guid>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/thomasn528/4019367517967249902/?src=hsrs#211185</guid>
      <description>awright awright awright :)</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thread: Memory almost full. Post by eRobin</title>
      <link>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/thomasn528/4019367517967249902/?src=hsr#211184</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 08:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
      <comments>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/thomasn528/4019367517967249902/?src=hsrs#211184</comments>
      <guid>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/thomasn528/4019367517967249902/?src=hsrs#211184</guid>
      <description>ohmygawd what is taking so long?????  how hard can this be?  your new place better be the best website I've ever seen.  

no pressure!
love,
eR ;)</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thread: Worth reading. Post by Thomas Nephew</title>
      <link>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/thomasn528/5936198646508878904/?src=hsr#211151</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 06:42:26 +0000</pubDate>
      <comments>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/thomasn528/5936198646508878904/?src=hsrs#211151</comments>
      <guid>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/thomasn528/5936198646508878904/?src=hsrs#211151</guid>
      <description>I think some kind of sovereignty enforcement is needed for a country to stay as it wishes to&quot; -- Well, what do you mean &quot;as it wishes to&quot;?
You're right, that was a little sloppy.  Perhaps &quot;defined as its constitution provides in the manner its constitution provides&quot; is better.  The Constitution gives the federal government ultimate authority over immigration, for good reason, in my view.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thread: Worth reading. Post by Rad Geek</title>
      <link>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/thomasn528/5936198646508878904/?src=hsr#211132</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 09:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
      <comments>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/thomasn528/5936198646508878904/?src=hsrs#211132</comments>
      <guid>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/thomasn528/5936198646508878904/?src=hsrs#211132</guid>
      <description>Continued from above...

[...] And that the current state of monopolization, hierarchy, and economic centralization under prevailing forms of corporate capitalism are the direct result (sometimes designed, sometimes undesigned) of artificial State subsidies to centralization, hierarchy, and bureaucracy in pro</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thread: Worth reading. Post by Rad Geek</title>
      <link>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/thomasn528/5936198646508878904/?src=hsr#211131</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 09:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
      <comments>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/thomasn528/5936198646508878904/?src=hsrs#211131</comments>
      <guid>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/thomasn528/5936198646508878904/?src=hsrs#211131</guid>
      <description>Thomas,

Thank you again for your kind words. I'm glad you've found the conversation useful.

You write: &quot;I have mixed feelings about borders -- I think some kind of sovereignty enforcement is needed for a country to stay as it wishes to&quot;

Well, what do you mean &quot;as it wishes to&quot;?

If you mean guaranteeing some particular kind of demographic balance in terms of ethnicity, nationality, or l</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thread: Worth reading. Post by Thomas Nephew</title>
      <link>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/thomasn528/5936198646508878904/?src=hsr#211080</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 15:32:53 +0000</pubDate>
      <comments>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/thomasn528/5936198646508878904/?src=hsrs#211080</comments>
      <guid>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/thomasn528/5936198646508878904/?src=hsrs#211080</guid>
      <description>This has been interesting.  I don't agree with all of what you say, but certainly do agree, for example, that fewer drug and vice laws would make for fewer unnecessary &quot;crimes&quot; to police.  

I have mixed feelings about borders -- I think some kind of sovereignty enforcement is needed for a country to stay as it wishes to -- yet I don't approve of beating up on poor people looking for work, or ma</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
